Skip to content

Conversation

@mdboom
Copy link
Contributor

@mdboommdboom commented Mar 21, 2024

increment_size+=expand_region_transitively_reachable(&increment, gc, gcstate);
}
GC_STAT_ADD(1, objects_queued, region_size);
GC_STAT_ADD(1, objects_queued, increment_size);
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if this is correct, but region_size doesn't exist.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if this make sense anymore. Maybe just drop the "queued" stat?

Copy link
Member

@markshannonmarkshannon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is going to conflict with #117120.
Once that's in, I'll review this properly.

increment_size+=expand_region_transitively_reachable(&increment, gc, gcstate);
}
GC_STAT_ADD(1, objects_queued, region_size);
GC_STAT_ADD(1, objects_queued, increment_size);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if this make sense anymore. Maybe just drop the "queued" stat?

@markshannon
Copy link
Member

Actually, don't worry about the merge conflict. I can fix it in my PR

@mdboom
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I'm not sure if this make sense anymore. Maybe just drop the "queued" stat?

I leave that to you, but this stat is new as of #116206 (it's just that it never compiled).

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@mdboom@markshannon