Skip to content

Conversation

@neonene
Copy link
Contributor

@neoneneneonene commented Apr 19, 2024

This introduces the following wrapper functions for the public C-API, so that the wrapped functions can have more arguments, such as a module state:

  • new_datetime_nofold_capi() wraps the new_datetime_ex funcion
  • new_time_nofold_capi(), renamed from new_time_ex, as it is internally unused.
  • new_timezone_capi() wraps the new_timezone funcion
  • new_datetime_capi() wraps the new_datetime_ex2 funcion
  • new_time_capi() wraps the new_time_ex2 funcion
  • new_date_capi() wraps the new_date_ex function
  • new_delta_capi() wraps the new_delta_ex function
  • datetime_fromtimestamp_capi() wraps the datetime_fromtimestamp function

Subsequently, some internal *_ex?() functions are renamed as well.
The wrappers need to get a module state from the C-API class or a given object's type.


cc @vstinner@erlend-aasland: I'd like to prepare as much as possible.

This introduces the following wrapper functions for the public C-API, so that the wrapped functions (`_capi` un-suffixed) can have more arguments, such as a module state: * `new_datetime_ex_capi()` * `new_time_ex_capi()`, renamed from `new_time_ex`, as it is internally unused. * `new_timezone_capi()` * `new_datetime_ex2_capi()` * `new_time_ex2_capi()` The wrappers need to get a module state from the C-API class or a given object's type.
}

staticPyObject*
new_datetime_ex_capi(intyear, intmonth, intday, inthour, intminute,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think that "_ex" is useful. Just rename it to "new_datetime_capi", no? Same remark for other functions.

Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your suggestion includes non-capi functions?

@neonene
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

neonene commented Apr 21, 2024

87408a9 is an attempt to strip _ex? from the non-capi functions except reduce().

@neoneneneonene closed this May 23, 2024
@neoneneneonene deleted the wrapper branch May 23, 2024 14:06
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@neonene@vstinner