Skip to content

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islingtonmiss-islington commented May 20, 2024

Many users think they want a locals argument for various reasons but they do not
understand that it makes code be treated as a class definition. They do not want
their code treated as a class definition and get surprised. The reason not
to pass locals specifically is that the following code raises a NameError:

exec("""def f(): print("hi")f()def g(): f()g()""",{},{})

The reason not to leave out globals is as follows:

deft(): exec("""def f(): print("hi")f()def g(): f()g() """)

(cherry picked from commit 7e1a130)

Co-authored-by: Hood Chatham roberthoodchatham@gmail.com


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--119239.org.readthedocs.build/

…ls argument (pythonGH-119235) Many users think they want a locals argument for various reasons but they do not understand that it makes code be treated as a class definition. They do not want their code treated as a class definition and get surprised. The reason not to pass locals specifically is that the following code raises a `NameError`: ```py exec(""" def f(): print("hi") f() def g(): f() g() """,{},{}) ``` The reason not to leave out globals is as follows: ```py def t(): exec(""" def f(): print("hi") f() def g(): f() g() """) ``` (cherry picked from commit 7e1a130) Co-authored-by: Hood Chatham <roberthoodchatham@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docsDocumentation in the Doc dirskip issueskip news

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@miss-islington@gpshead@hoodmane