Skip to content

Conversation

@neonene
Copy link
Contributor

@neoneneneonene commented May 27, 2024

Check if the DateType C-API type matches the datetime.date type on main and shared/isolated subinterpreters.

@ericsnowcurrently Please review if this usage is not invalid.

Copy link
Member

@ericsnowcurrentlyericsnowcurrently left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The test makes sense. Thanks for adding it. I have one question.

@bedevere-app
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@neonene
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I have made the requested changes; please review again.

@bedevere-app
Copy link

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@ericsnowcurrently: please review the changes made to this pull request.

@neoneneneonene changed the title gh-117398: Add test for datetime C API type checkgh-117398: Add C-API test for datetime static type checkMay 28, 2024
@ericsnowcurrently
Copy link
Member

It looks like part of your PR was removed by mistake. I thought the new test in test_capi.test_misc would still be there.

@neoneneneonene changed the title gh-117398: Add C-API test for datetime static type checkgh-117398: Add datetime C-API type check test for subinterpretersMay 29, 2024
Copy link
Member

@ericsnowcurrentlyericsnowcurrently left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for moving that test! There's just one thing to address and then this PR should be ready to merge. Thanks for your patience.

@bedevere-app
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@neonene
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I have made the requested changes; please review again.

@bedevere-app
Copy link

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@ericsnowcurrently: please review the changes made to this pull request.

Copy link
Member

@ericsnowcurrentlyericsnowcurrently left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@miss-islington-app
Copy link

Thanks @neonene for the PR, and @ericsnowcurrently for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
…rs (pythongh-119604) Check if the DateTime C-API type matches the datetime.date type on main and shared/isolated subinterpreters. (cherry picked from commit 50a3895) Co-authored-by: neonene <53406459+neonene@users.noreply.github.com>
@bedevere-app
Copy link

GH-120463 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch.

@bedevere-appbedevere-appbot removed the needs backport to 3.13 bugs and security fixes label Jun 13, 2024
@ericsnowcurrently
Copy link
Member

Thanks again for all your work on this, @neonene!

@neoneneneonene deleted the capi_type_check branch June 13, 2024 18:10
ericsnowcurrently pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
…ers (gh-120463) Check if the DateTime C-API type matches the datetime.date type on main and shared/isolated subinterpreters. (cherry picked from commit 50a3895, AKA gh-119604) Co-authored-by: neonene <53406459+neonene@users.noreply.github.com>
mrahtz pushed a commit to mrahtz/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2024
…rs (pythongh-119604) Check if the DateTime C-API type matches the datetime.date type on main and shared/isolated subinterpreters.
noahbkim pushed a commit to hudson-trading/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2024
…rs (pythongh-119604) Check if the DateTime C-API type matches the datetime.date type on main and shared/isolated subinterpreters.
estyxx pushed a commit to estyxx/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
…rs (pythongh-119604) Check if the DateTime C-API type matches the datetime.date type on main and shared/isolated subinterpreters.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

skip newstestsTests in the Lib/test dir

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@neonene@ericsnowcurrently@encukou