Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34k
gh-125498: Update JIT builds to use LLVM 19 and use preserve_none#125499
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
savannahostrowski commented Oct 15, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
savannahostrowski commented Oct 22, 2024
So it looks like the Python version installed with |
savannahostrowski commented Oct 22, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Update as of 10/22: |
brandtbucher left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, just a few opportunities to tidy things up:
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core_and_Builtins/2024-10-22-04-18-53.gh-issue-125498.cFjPIn.rst Outdated Show resolvedHide resolved
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
…e-125498.cFjPIn.rst Co-authored-by: Brandt Bucher <brandtbucher@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Brandt Bucher <brandtbucher@gmail.com>
savannahostrowski commented Oct 29, 2024
Oooo, thanks for the review @brandtbucher. Great catches for cleaning things up a bit. Much simpler. |
preserve_none in JIT buildspreserve_none
brandtbucher left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome! @mdboom, I'm landing this, so we should probably also update the benchmark runners that need it. Let me know if you want help.
mdboom commented Oct 30, 2024
Yep -- I'll do that now. |
…e_none (pythonGH-125499)" This reverts commit c29bbe2.
preserve_nonein JIT builds #125498