Update cryptographic primitives code owners.

[picnixz]

No description provided.

[picnixz]

I don't know why the SBOM regeneration fails on Windows (looks like a network issue) :') Guess I'll just try again a bit later.

[AA-Turner]

It is wasteful to run CI on updates to CODEOWNERS, perhaps we should add it to the exclusions here:

cpython/.github/workflows/reusable-change-detection.yml

Lines 69 to 87 in 5ace717

	if [ -z "$GITHUB_BASE_REF" ]; then
	echo "run-tests=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
	else
	git fetch origin "$GITHUB_BASE_REF" --depth=1
	# git diff "origin/$GITHUB_BASE_REF..." (3 dots) may be more
	# reliable than git diff "origin/$GITHUB_BASE_REF.." (2 dots),
	# but it requires to download more commits (this job uses
	# "git fetch --depth=1").
	#
	# git diff "origin/$GITHUB_BASE_REF..." (3 dots) works with Git
	# 2.26, but Git 2.28 is stricter and fails with "no merge base".
	#
	# git diff "origin/$GITHUB_BASE_REF.." (2 dots) should be enough on
	# GitHub, since GitHub starts by merging origin/$GITHUB_BASE_REF
	# into the PR branch anyway.
	#
	# https://github.com/python/core-workflow/issues/373
	git diff --name-only "origin/$GITHUB_BASE_REF.." | grep -qvE '(\.rst$|^Doc|^Misc|^\.pre-commit-config\.yaml$|\.ruff\.toml$|\.md$|mypy\.ini$)' && echo "run-tests=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT" || true
	fi

A

[picnixz]

I'll wait for #128754 to be merged so that we can test it (I'll make an empty commit to trigger the CI).

[hugovk]

I'll wait for #128754 to be merged so that we can test it (I'll make an empty commit to trigger the CI).

Now merged.

[picnixz]

It looks like the CI is now in a good shape:

I guess we're good to go then.