Skip to content

Conversation

@skirpichev
Copy link
Member

@skirpichevskirpichev commented Apr 24, 2025

It seems, no code actually uses these names, only sizes of the unnamed union members are important. Though, I think it's good to be here consistent wrt type codes ('g' for long double, etc).

This amends 85f89cb.

It seems, no code actually uses these names, only sizes of the unnamed union members are important. Though, I think it's good to be here consistent wrt type codes ('g' for long double, etc). This amends 85f89cb.
@vstinnervstinner merged commit 5808889 into python:mainApr 24, 2025
45 checks passed
@skirpichevskirpichev deleted the amend-85f89cb3e6/121249 branch April 24, 2025 10:08
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@skirpichev@vstinner