Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34k
GH-132775: Fix argument parsing for _interpqueues.put()#137686
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
AA-Turner commented Aug 12, 2025 • edited by bedevere-app bot
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited by bedevere-app bot
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ericsnowcurrently commented Aug 21, 2025
Just be sure I understood, the problem is that the arg spec for I'm pretty sure the FWIW, at the time, with the feature freeze at hand, I didn't worry about ironing out little API quirks (e.g. placeholder args) in the low-level module. It isn't exposed to users, right? Footnotes
|
ericsnowcurrently commented Aug 21, 2025
To be clear, I left room for other "fallback" options later, rather than it being a definite binary choice. Sorry that wasn't more clear. Then again, that decision was probably a premature accommodation for a possible future. I figure it doesn't matter much though. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
AA-Turner commented Aug 21, 2025
Yes, specifically that the format spec for
I've updated the PR. I don't think we need the test anymore given this is the current behaviour -- we are just removing the errant
Definitely the correct choice. A |
ericsnowcurrently left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
79aeeb8 into python:mainUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Thanks @AA-Turner for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.14. |
…thonGH-137686) (cherry picked from commit 79aeeb8) Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
GH-138034 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch. |
serhiy-storchaka commented Aug 22, 2025
And I think that it would be better to remove passing explicit -1 as the fallback argument to |
…)`` (pythonGH-137686) (python#138034) Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
Bug introduced in #134440, cc @serhiy-storchaka@ericsnowcurrently. Also xref gh-137685.
A