Skip to content

[3.13] gh-116946: Revert GC protocol for immutable empty heap types (GH-138322, GH-138323, GH-138326)#138337

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
kumaraditya303 merged 3 commits into from
Sep 1, 2025
Merged

[3.13] gh-116946: Revert GC protocol for immutable empty heap types (GH-138322, GH-138323, GH-138326) #138337

kumaraditya303 merged 3 commits into from
Sep 1, 2025

Conversation

@picnixz
Copy link
Member

@picnixzpicnixz commented Sep 1, 2025•
edited
Loading

This reverts commits 90036f5828682d and 21b5932. I mistakenly assumed that immutable empty types also needed to support the GC protocol but this is not the case.

@bedevere-appbedevere-appbot mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2025
Open
@picnixzpicnixz changed the title gh-116946: Revert GC protocol for immutable empty heap types (GH-138322, GH-138323)[3.13] gh-116946: Revert GC protocol for immutable empty heap types (GH-138322, GH-138323)Sep 1, 2025
@picnixzpicnixz changed the title [3.13] gh-116946: Revert GC protocol for immutable empty heap types (GH-138322, GH-138323)[3.13] gh-116946: Revert GC protocol for immutable empty heap types (GH-138322, GH-138323, GH-138326)Sep 1, 2025
@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 merged commit a38f026 into python:3.13Sep 1, 2025
71 of 73 checks passed
@picnixzpicnixz deleted the fix/313/gc/revert-for-immutable-empty-types branch September 1, 2025 15:49
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 approved these changes

@ZeroIntensityZeroIntensityAwaiting requested review from ZeroIntensity

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@picnixz@kumaraditya303