Skip to content

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islingtonmiss-islington commented Sep 18, 2025

Prior to 3.9, Py_AddPendingCall() would always run pending calls in the main interpreter, but then each interpreter got their own ceval state, and they were scheduled for any interpreter. In GH-104813, this was undone, so Py_AddPendingCall() would always schedule for the main interpreter.
(cherry picked from commit 89ff88b)

Co-authored-by: Peter Bierma zintensitydev@gmail.com


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--139119.org.readthedocs.build/

…ythonGH-139117) Prior to 3.9, Py_AddPendingCall() would always run pending calls in the main interpreter, but then each interpreter got their own ceval state, and they were scheduled for any interpreter. In pythonGH-104813, this was undone, so Py_AddPendingCall() would always schedule for the main interpreter. (cherry picked from commit 89ff88b) Co-authored-by: Peter Bierma <zintensitydev@gmail.com>
@github-project-automationgithub-project-automationbot moved this from Todo to In Progress in Sprint 2024Sep 18, 2025
@ZeroIntensityZeroIntensity enabled auto-merge (squash) September 18, 2025 12:11
@ZeroIntensityZeroIntensity merged commit 24b6992 into python:3.13Sep 18, 2025
35 of 36 checks passed
@github-project-automationgithub-project-automationbot moved this from In Progress to Done in Sprint 2024Sep 18, 2025
@github-project-automationgithub-project-automationbot moved this from Todo to Done in Docs PRsSep 18, 2025
@miss-islingtonmiss-islington deleted the backport-89ff88b-3.13 branch January 2, 2026 17:39
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: Done
Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@miss-islington@ZeroIntensity