Skip to content

Conversation

@ZeroIntensity
Copy link
Member

@ZeroIntensityZeroIntensity commented Nov 6, 2025

Comment on lines 461 to 462
Return true if *od* is a dict object, but not an instance of a subtype of
the :class:`~collections.OrderedDict` type. This function always succeeds.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Return true if *od* is a dict object, but not an instance of a subtype of
the :class:`~collections.OrderedDict` type. This function always succeeds.
Return true if *od* is an ordered dictionary object, but not
an instance of a subtype of the :class:`~collections.OrderedDict` type.
This function always succeeds.
- a dict object+ an ordered dictionary object

Copy link
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Applied this one locally because I didn't want to deal with conflicts.

Comment on lines 448 to 449
Since Python 3.7, dictionaries are ordered by default, so there is usually
little need for this object.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggest moving this to the introductory paragraph.

Copy link
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@ZeroIntensity
Copy link
MemberAuthor

I'd like to finish #141009 before doing this one.

Copy link
Member

@StanFromIrelandStanFromIreland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ZeroIntensityZeroIntensity added needs backport to 3.13 bugs and security fixes needs backport to 3.14 bugs and security fixes labels Nov 17, 2025
@ZeroIntensityZeroIntensity merged commit b362632 into python:mainNov 17, 2025
30 checks passed
@github-project-automationgithub-project-automationbot moved this from Todo to Done in Docs PRsNov 17, 2025
@ZeroIntensityZeroIntensity deleted the document-pyodict branch November 17, 2025 19:40
@miss-islington-app
Copy link

Thanks @ZeroIntensity for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13, 3.14.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2025
(cherry picked from commit b362632) Co-authored-by: Peter Bierma <[email protected]>
@bedevere-app
Copy link

GH-141677 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch.

@bedevere-appbedevere-appbot removed the needs backport to 3.14 bugs and security fixes label Nov 17, 2025
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2025
(cherry picked from commit b362632) Co-authored-by: Peter Bierma <[email protected]>
@bedevere-app
Copy link

GH-141678 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch.

@bedevere-appbedevere-appbot removed the needs backport to 3.13 bugs and security fixes label Nov 17, 2025
ZeroIntensity added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2025
gh-141004: Document `PyODict*` APIs (GH-141136) (cherry picked from commit b362632) Co-authored-by: Peter Bierma <[email protected]>
ZeroIntensity added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2025
gh-141004: Document `PyODict*` APIs (GH-141136) (cherry picked from commit b362632) Co-authored-by: Peter Bierma <[email protected]>
StanFromIreland pushed a commit to StanFromIreland/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docsDocumentation in the Doc dirskip news

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ZeroIntensity@StanFromIreland