Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34k
gh-142451: correctly copy HMAC attributes in HMAC.copy()#142510
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
picnixz commented Dec 10, 2025 • edited by bedevere-app bot
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited by bedevere-app bot
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
picnixz commented Dec 10, 2025
!buildbot FIPS-only |
bedevere-bot commented Dec 10, 2025
The regex 'FIPS-only' did not match any buildbot builder. Is the requested builder in the list of stable builders? |
picnixz commented Dec 10, 2025
!buildbot FIPS |
bedevere-bot commented Dec 10, 2025
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @picnixz for commit cc591f8 🤖 Results will be shown at: https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F142510%2Fmerge The command will test the builders whose names match following regular expression: The builders matched are:
|
picnixz commented Dec 10, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Oh by the way, there is a separate issue with I'll fix this separately but this week-end. |
d3ef5ba into python:mainUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
GH-142698 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch. |
1 similar comment
GH-142698 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch. |
GH-142701 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
bedevere-bot commented Dec 14, 2025
|
bedevere-bot commented Dec 14, 2025
|
There was actually a much older issue in
copy()were we didn't copy the block size. Considering no one has ever complained about this for the past 20 years, I think that no one is actually usingcopy()followed by.block_sizesomewhere... I will backport this as well to 3.13 and 3.14.