bpo-30439: Add a basic high-level interpreters module.#1803
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mention-bot commented May 24, 2017
@ericsnowcurrently, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @akuchling, @doko42 and @Yhg1s to be potential reviewers. |
Member
1st1 commented May 25, 2017
(added myself as a reviewer as I want to look in detail at this patch later; but we'll need more eyes on this) |
MemberAuthor
ericsnowcurrently commented May 25, 2017
I'm closing this for now as I do not expect it to be appropriate to merge in the short term. After further discussion on python-ideas, etc. I may revive it. |
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
(based on #1802)
Note that, unlike the preceding 2 patches, this one adds a "public" module to the stdlib. As such it requires more careful attention to the API/abstractions, as well as stronger consensus from python-dev and the other major Python implementations. As such, this PR is equally a proof-of-concept and a proposal.