Skip to content

bpo-1635741: Calling Py_INCREF() after PyModule_AddObject() success to run#18365

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
shihai1991 wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

bpo-1635741: Calling Py_INCREF() after PyModule_AddObject() success to run #18365

shihai1991 wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@shihai1991
Copy link
Member

@shihai1991shihai1991 commented Feb 5, 2020•
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

@shihai1991
Copy link
MemberAuthor

shihai1991 commented Feb 5, 2020

Oh, it is generated file, i will check this operation soon.

@shihai1991shihai1991 changed the title bpo-1635741: Calling Py_DECREF() if PyModule_AddObject() fails to runbpo-1635741: Calling Py_INCREF() after PyModule_AddObject() success to runFeb 5, 2020
@shihai1991
Copy link
MemberAuthor

shihai1991 commented Feb 5, 2020

cc @vstinner Hi, victor. It's a small fix. pls review it if you have free time.

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

vstinner commented Feb 5, 2020

cc @pablogsal@isidentical

@isidentical
Copy link
Member

isidentical commented Feb 5, 2020

I recently saw a PR from @brandtbucher about a more general change that already includes this if I am not mistaken. Check out #17276 (it moves incref after the check by moving check upper). I am in favor of #17276 because it handles the case better also it opened before this PR

@brandtbucher
Copy link
Member

brandtbucher commented Feb 5, 2020•
edited
Loading

I'm also working my way through the other broken modules in bpo-38823. I need to land #17298 before I can make further progress, though.

brandtbucher
brandtbucher requested changes Feb 5, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@brandtbucherbrandtbucher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, my PR #17276 is a more comprehensive fix.

@brandtbucherbrandtbucher added the type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error label Feb 5, 2020
@shihai1991
Copy link
MemberAuthor

shihai1991 commented Feb 6, 2020

Oh, thank you for quick feedback, guys.
I checked Brandt's PRs, its enhance very nice. Pls go ahead, thanks. I will subscribe your PRs ;)

@kylotankylotanmannequin mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2022
Closed
@brandtbucherbrandtbucher mentioned this pull request Apr 10, 2022
Closed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@brandtbucherbrandtbucherbrandtbucher requested changes

@vstinnervstinnerAwaiting requested review from vstinner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

awaiting core reviewtype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@shihai1991@vstinner@isidentical@brandtbucher@the-knights-who-say-ni@bedevere-bot