[3.9] bpo-42073: allow classmethod to wrap other classmethod-like descriptors.#22757
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bpo-19072 (python#8405) allows `classmethod` to wrap other descriptors, but this does not work when the wrapped descriptor mimics classmethod. The current PR fixes this. In Python 3.8 and before, one could create a callable descriptor such that this works as expected (see Lib/test/test_decorators.py for examples): ```python class A: @myclassmethod def f1(cls): return cls @classmethod @myclassmethod def f2(cls): return cls ``` In Python 3.8 and before, `A.f2()` return `A`. Currently in Python 3.9, it returns `type(A)`. This PR make `A.f2()` return `A` again. As of python#8405, classmethod calls `obj.__get__(type)` if `obj` has `__get__`. This allows one to chain `@classmethod` and `@property` together. When using classmethod-like descriptors, it's the second argument to `__get__`--the owner or the type--that is important, but this argument is currently missing. Since it is None, the "owner" argument is assumed to be the type of the first argument, which, in this case, is wrong (we want `A`, not `type(A)`). This PR updates classmethod to call `obj.__get__(type, type)` if `obj` has `__get__`.
eriknw changed the title 
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days |
ambv requested review from 1st1, abalkin, asvetlov, berkerpeksag, brettcannon, encukou, ericsnowcurrently, ericvsmith, ethanfurman, gpshead, gvanrossum, ilevkivskyi, isidentical, lysnikolaou, markshannon, methane, ncoghlan, pablogsal, pganssle, rhettinger, terryjreedy and tiran as code owners
Contributor
ambv commented Jul 13, 2021
Oops, changing the base of the pull request didn't do what I thought it would and reverting back to 3.9 leaves the mess as is. I'll recreate this pull request on |
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
bpo-19072 (#8405) allows
classmethodto wrap other descriptors, but this does not work when the wrapped descriptor mimics classmethod. The current PR fixes this.In Python 3.8 and before, one could create a callable descriptor such that this works as expected (see Lib/test/test_decorators.py for examples):
In Python 3.8 and before,
A.f2()returnA. Currently in Python 3.9, it returnstype(A). This PR makeA.f2()returnAagain.As of #8405, classmethod calls
obj.__get__(type)ifobjhas__get__. This allows one to chain@classmethodand@propertytogether. When using classmethod-like descriptors, it's the second argument to__get__--the owner or the type--that is important, but this argument is currently missing. Since it is None, the "owner" argument is assumed to be the type of the first argument, which, in this case, is wrong (we wantA, nottype(A)).This PR updates classmethod to call
obj.__get__(type, type)ifobjhas__get__.This PR is targeting Python 3.9 branch, because I think this is a bug fix. I can also target master (3.10).
I'm not really sure where to add a note of this change.
https://bugs.python.org/issue42073