Skip to content

Conversation

@ericsnowcurrently
Copy link
Member

@ericsnowcurrentlyericsnowcurrently commented Oct 21, 2020

The original tool wasn't working right and it was simpler to create a new one, partially re-using some of the old code. At this point the tool runs properly on the master. (Try: ./python Tools/c-analyzer/c-analyzer.py analyze.) It take ~35 seconds on my machine to analyze the full CPython code base.

Note that we'll need to iron out some OS-specific stuff (e.g. preprocessor). We're okay though since this tool isn't used yet in our workflow. We will also need to verify the analysis results in detail before activating the check in CI, though I'm pretty sure it's close.

https://bugs.python.org/issue36876

@pablogsal
Copy link
Member

I would recommend checking with the buildbot label before merging as some of the refleaks were reported previously with the old analyzer (although most were false positives).

@ericsnowcurrently
Copy link
MemberAuthor

I would recommend checking with the buildbot label before merging as some of the refleaks were reported previously with the old analyzer (although most were false positives).

FWIW, this PR removes all the tool's tests, except for the one we care about (and that one is currently disabled). So refleaks shouldn't be a problem. 😄

@ericsnowcurrentlyericsnowcurrently merged commit 345cd37 into python:masterOct 23, 2020
@ericsnowcurrentlyericsnowcurrently deleted the globalss-c-analyzer-total-rewrite branch October 23, 2020 00:42
adorilson pushed a commit to adorilson/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2021
The original tool wasn't working right and it was simpler to create a new one, partially re-using some of the old code. At this point the tool runs properly on the master. (Try: ./python Tools/c-analyzer/c-analyzer.py analyze.) It take ~40 seconds on my machine to analyze the full CPython code base. Note that we'll need to iron out some OS-specific stuff (e.g. preprocessor). We're okay though since this tool isn't used yet in our workflow. We will also need to verify the analysis results in detail before activating the check in CI, though I'm pretty sure it's close. https://bugs.python.org/issue36876
@dmacksdmacks mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ericsnowcurrently@pablogsal@the-knights-who-say-ni@bedevere-bot