bpo-44184: Apply GH-26274 to the non-GC-type branch of subtype_dealloc.#27165
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… it is also trying to use a type after it's potentially been freed.
Yhg1s added skip news needs backport to 3.9 needs backport to 3.10 
pablogsal approved these changes Jul 15, 2021
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
miss-islington commented Jul 15, 2021
Thanks @Yhg1s for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10, 3.9. |
bedevere-bot commented Jul 15, 2021
GH-27174 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch. |
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2021
…dealloc (pythonGH-27165) The non-GC-type branch of subtype_dealloc is using the type of an object after freeing in the same unsafe way as pythonGH-26274 fixes. (I believe the old news entry covers this change well enough.) https://bugs.python.org/issue44184 (cherry picked from commit 074e765) Co-authored-by: T. Wouters <[email protected]>
bedevere-bot commented Jul 15, 2021
GH-27175 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch. |
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2021
…dealloc (pythonGH-27165) The non-GC-type branch of subtype_dealloc is using the type of an object after freeing in the same unsafe way as pythonGH-26274 fixes. (I believe the old news entry covers this change well enough.) https://bugs.python.org/issue44184 (cherry picked from commit 074e765) Co-authored-by: T. Wouters <[email protected]>
Yhg1s added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2021
GH-27165) (GH-27174) The non-GC-type branch of subtype_dealloc is using the type of an object after freeing in the same unsafe way as GH-26274 fixes. (I believe the old news entry covers this change well enough.) https://bugs.python.org/issue44184 (cherry picked from commit 074e765) Co-authored-by: T. Wouters <[email protected]>
Yhg1s added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2021
GH-27165) (GH-27175) The non-GC-type branch of subtype_dealloc is using the type of an object after freeing in the same unsafe way as GH-26274 fixes. (I believe the old news entry covers this change well enough.) https://bugs.python.org/issue44184 (cherry picked from commit 074e765) Co-authored-by: T. Wouters <[email protected]>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The non-GC-type branch of subtype_dealloc is using the type of an object after freeing in the same unsafe way as GH-26274 fixes. (I believe the old news entry covers this change well enough.)
https://bugs.python.org/issue44184