Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.9k
Use current name for macOS#55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
the-knights-who-say-ni commented Feb 12, 2017
Hello, and thanks for your contribution! I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA). Unfortunately we couldn't find an account corresponding to your GitHub username on bugs.python.org (b.p.o) to verify you have signed the CLA. This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at your contribution. Please follow these steps to help rectify the issue:
Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it! |
vstinner commented Feb 12, 2017
@paulschreiber: please sign the CLA. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #55 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 82.37% 82.37% -0.01% ========================================== Files 1427 1427 Lines 350948 350948 ========================================== - Hits 289097 289095 -2 - Misses 61851 61853 +2Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
paulschreiber commented Feb 12, 2017
I'm paulschreiber on bugs.python.org. I signed the CLA. |
willingc commented Feb 12, 2017
@paulschreiber If you haven't put your GitHub user name in your bugs.python.org account, you will need to do that. If you have, then you should be good 👍 |
brettcannon commented Feb 13, 2017
It also takes one US business day for the CLA to get updated by a human being, so hopefully this will get cleared up sometime today or tomorrow (and I checked that the GitHub username is filled in properly on bpo). |
methane commented Feb 20, 2017
@paulschreiber would you resolve conflict? |
methane commented Feb 20, 2017
thanks |
Mariatta commented Feb 25, 2017
I think this needs to be backported to 3.6, 3.5, and 2.7. |
ned-deily commented Feb 25, 2017
Go ahead, I think it's OK to cherry-pick to those releases, certainly for 3.6. |
(cherry picked from commit c086685)
miss-islington commented Sep 13, 2017
Thanks @paulschreiber for the PR, and @methane for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 2.7. |
miss-islington commented Sep 13, 2017
Sorry, @paulschreiber and @methane, I could not cleanly backport this to |
Fix a setup.cfg metadata bug Closespython#55 See merge request python-devs/importlib_resources!59
This patch adds a job that is able to accurately signal whether all the expectations of the required jobs to succeed are met. This job can then be used as a source of truth for judging whether "CI passes" and can be used in the branch protection. It also plays a role of a convenient "gate" — this is the only job that would have to be listed in the branch protection as opposed to listing every single job name generated by the test matrix (and they all have different names — it's not possible to just select one `test` job name). Ref: https://github.com/re-actors/alls-green#why
…-actions Cleanup grammar and actions // Remove unnecessary fstring code
No description provided.