Skip to content

Conversation

@zware
Copy link
Member

Includes GH-2, GH-70, GH-73, and GH-21.

@Mariatta
Copy link
Member

GH-73 has already been cherry-picked in GH-79 :)

Copy link
Member

@brettcannonbrettcannon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Quick glance of the rendered output LGTM.

@brettcannon
Copy link
Member

So should this be merged in spite of GH-79?

@zware
Copy link
MemberAuthor

This change contains GH-79, and git recorded this change as a delete README and add README.rst, so there's no conflict. I'll go ahead and merge.

@zwarezware merged commit 1e8cc88 into python:3.6Feb 15, 2017
@zwarezware deleted the 3.6 branch February 15, 2017 19:29
@zwarezware restored the 3.6 branch February 15, 2017 19:30
akruis pushed a commit to akruis/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2017
Reimplement Stackless/unittests/support.py. The new implementation is more IDE friendly and requires only a single pass to run all test with and without soft switching. Base all tests on StacklessTestCase. Remove a second call of unittest.main from ```if __name__ == "__main__"```-blocks https://bitbucket.org/stackless-dev/stackless/issues/86 (grafted from 8237bba0d27ab1bdd2cdbfa52c7bdb6f468119a7, 719923b5c638, 06295530c672, 65cff13662f2)
colesbury referenced this pull request in colesbury/nogil Oct 6, 2021
See #86 This does not fix races where the _localimpl is delete by another thread... but I don't think the _threading_local implementation is actually used.
jaraco pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2022
jaraco added a commit to jaraco/cpython that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@zware@Mariatta@brettcannon@the-knights-who-say-ni