Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34k
gh-87452 Making returncode unreliability explicit#92181
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
zitterbewegung commented May 2, 2022 • edited by terryjreedy
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited by terryjreedy
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
bedevere-bot commented May 2, 2022
Every change to Python requires a NEWS entry. Please, add it using the blurb_it Web app or the blurb command-line tool. |
benjaminp commented May 2, 2022
Thank you for the PR. I don't think "out-of-date" is the right term here. Either the entire |
benjaminp commented May 2, 2022
I would propose: |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
erlend-aasland commented May 3, 2022
Please remove the duplicate NEWS entry. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Oleg Iarygin <dralife@yandex.ru>
erlend-aasland left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Again, please remove the duplicate NEWS entry. Also please address Benjamin's remarks.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
bedevere-bot commented Oct 14, 2022
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
slateny commented Dec 6, 2022
@zitterbewegung Would you still be interested in giving the PR a quick update per the reviews above? |
zitterbewegung commented Dec 6, 2022
Sorry I can do that. |
Wrapping to 79 characters.
netlifybot commented Dec 6, 2022 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
✅ Deploy Preview for python-cpython-preview ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
Removing newline
zitterbewegung left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Fixed word wrap issue
- Removed duplicate news entry.
zitterbewegung left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed trailing whitespace
zitterbewegung commented Dec 6, 2022
I have made the requested changes; please review again. |
bedevere-bot commented Dec 6, 2022
Thanks for making the requested changes! @erlend-aasland: please review the changes made to this pull request. |
zitterbewegung commented Apr 24, 2023
@erlend-aasland can this be reviewed? |
miss-islington commented Apr 24, 2023
Thanks @zitterbewegung for the PR, and @gpshead for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11. |
erlend-aasland commented Apr 25, 2023
Sorry for the delay; thanks Greg for merging. Thanks for the PR, Joshua. |
We make explicit that the value stored in return code is best returned by poll instead of using the value in return code.
gh-87452: Making returncode unreliability explicit