gh-94590: add signatures to operator itemgetter, attrgetter, methodcaller#94591
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes#94590
These functions were intentionally skipped when operator was updated to use the argument clinic:
#64385 (comment)
However, by not using the argument clinic, they missed out on getting signatures. This is a narrow PR to update the docstrings so that
__text_signature__can be extracted from them. Updating to use the argument clinic is beyond scope.methodcalleruses*args, **kwargsto match variadic names used elsewhere (e.g.,operator.calluses*args, **kwargs).These changes are pretty minimal. Should I add tests (if so, where?) or a blurb?