Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34k
bpo-34722: Consistent serialization of sets in bytecode#9472
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | ||
| Ensures that sets / frozensets marshal in a consistent order by sorting the | ||
| serialised items before writing them. This will result in somewhat slower | ||
| serialisation but bytecode files using set literals in certain contexts will | ||
| now serialise deterministically where it didn't before. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ w_complex_object(PyObject *v, char flag, WFILE *p) | ||
| w_object((PyObject *)NULL, p); | ||
| } | ||
| else if (PyAnySet_CheckExact(v)){ | ||
| PyObject *value, *it; | ||
| PyObject *value, *l; | ||
| if (PyObject_TypeCheck(v, &PySet_Type)) | ||
| W_TYPE(TYPE_SET, p); | ||
| @@ -509,17 +509,27 @@ w_complex_object(PyObject *v, char flag, WFILE *p) | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| W_SIZE(n, p); | ||
| it = PyObject_GetIter(v); | ||
| if (it == NULL){ | ||
| l = PySequence_List(v); | ||
| if (l == NULL){ | ||
| p->depth--; | ||
| p->error = WFERR_UNMARSHALLABLE; | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| while ((value = PyIter_Next(it)) != NULL){ | ||
| w_object(value, p); | ||
| Py_DECREF(value); | ||
| for (i = 0; i < n; i++){ | ||
| value = PyList_GetItem(l, i); | ||
| value = PyMarshal_WriteObjectToString(value, Py_MARSHAL_VERSION); | ||
| ||
| PyList_SetItem(l, i, value); | ||
| } | ||
| if (PyList_Sort(l) == -1){ | ||
| Py_DECREF(l); | ||
| p->depth--; | ||
| p->error = WFERR_UNMARSHALLABLE; | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| for (i = 0; i < n; i++){ | ||
| w_object(PyList_GetItem(l, i), p); | ||
| } | ||
| Py_DECREF(it); | ||
| Py_DECREF(l); | ||
| if (PyErr_Occurred()){ | ||
| p->depth--; | ||
| p->error = WFERR_UNMARSHALLABLE; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the
PyList_GetItem()andPyList_SetItem()calls added in this patch should be replaced with thePyList_GET_ITEM()andPyList_SET_ITEM()macros.Also,
PyMarshal_WriteObjectToString()should be checked for failure.