Skip to content

Conversation

@kumaraditya303
Copy link
Contributor

@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 commented Oct 21, 2022

This PR changes asyncio.wait_for to use asyncio.timeout as its underlying implementation. It simplifies the code and makes it easy to understand the cancellation semantics as both asyncio.timeout and asyncio.wait_for behaves similarly.

Fixes#86296
Fixes#81839
Fixes#96764

@kumaraditya303
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

This is more of a POC at this point. I think it is worth changing wait_for to use timeout in 3.12+. This seems to fix some of the open bugs of wait_for, I'll add those tests to make sure.

cc @gvanrossum

Copy link
Member

@gvanrossumgvanrossum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You got a bit farther than I did when I tried this, but I'm still concerned why you had to modify several tests. (Also, there's one test that fails in CI, but doesn't appear to fail when I run it locally.)

Copy link
Member

@gvanrossumgvanrossum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG (one naming nit).

@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2022 06:03
@kumaraditya303kumaraditya303 added type-feature A feature request or enhancement topic-asyncio labels Oct 25, 2022
@gvanrossum
Copy link
Member

I had hoped to first merge one of the alternatives that can be backported to 3.10, so we can declare this fixed in 3.10. Then we would merge this one on top of that, but only in 3.11 and main.

But we could also just do a custom fix for 3.10 based on one of @twisteroidambassador's PRs. (I wish you had linked this PR to the same issue rather than creating a new issue, since it's all related.)

@gvanrossum
Copy link
Member

In particular, @twisteroidambassador has this PR: #98607

bdraco added a commit to bdraco/python-kasa that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2023
Fallback to using async_timeout on older python asyncio.wait_for has some underlying problems that are only fixed in cpython 3.12. See python/cpython#98518
bdraco added a commit to bdraco/python-kasa that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2023
Fallback to using async_timeout on older python asyncio.wait_for has some underlying problems that are only fixed in cpython 3.12. See python/cpython#98518
bdraco added a commit to bdraco/python-kasa that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2023
Fallback to using async_timeout on older python asyncio.wait_for has some underlying problems that are only fixed in cpython 3.12. See python/cpython#98518
bdraco added a commit to bdraco/python-kasa that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2023
Fallback to using async_timeout on older python asyncio.wait_for has some underlying problems that are only fixed in cpython 3.12. See python/cpython#98518
rytilahti pushed a commit to python-kasa/python-kasa that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2023
asyncio.wait_for has some underlying problems that are only fixed in cpython 3.12. Use async_timeout instead until the minimum supported version is 3.11+ and it can be replaced with asyncio.timeout See python/cpython#98518
bdraco added a commit to bdraco/ha-HAP-python that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2023
async_timeout does not suffer from the same race problems as asyncio.wait_for see python/cpython#98518 for more details
SomberNight added a commit to SomberNight/electrum that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2023
wasted some time because asyncio.wait_for() was suppressing cancellations. [0][1][2] deja vu... [3] Looks like this is finally getting fixed in cpython 3.12 [4] So far away... In attempt to avoid encountering this again, let's try using asyncio.timeout in 3.11, which is how upstream reimplemented wait_for in 3.12 [4], and aiorpcx.timeout_after in 3.8-3.10. [0] python/cpython#86296 [1] https://bugs.python.org/issue42130 [2] https://bugs.python.org/issue45098 [3] kyuupichan/aiorpcX#44 [4] python/cpython#98518
SomberNight added a commit to spesmilo/electrum that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2023
wasted some time because asyncio.wait_for() was suppressing cancellations. [0][1][2] deja vu... [3] Looks like this is finally getting fixed in cpython 3.12 [4] So far away... In attempt to avoid encountering this again, let's try using asyncio.timeout in 3.11, which is how upstream reimplemented wait_for in 3.12 [4], and aiorpcx.timeout_after in 3.8-3.10. [0] python/cpython#86296 [1] https://bugs.python.org/issue42130 [2] https://bugs.python.org/issue45098 [3] kyuupichan/aiorpcX#44 [4] python/cpython#98518
bdraco added a commit to bdraco/python-androidtv that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2023
`asyncio.wait_for` creates another tasks which leads to some race conditions in cancelation and a performance hit cpython 3.12 will change the underlying implementation of `asyncio.wait_for` to use `asyncio.wait` but that is still a long way off for many people: python/cpython#98518
JeffLIrion pushed a commit to JeffLIrion/python-androidtv that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2023
* Switch usage of asyncio.wait_for to async_timeout `asyncio.wait_for` creates another tasks which leads to some race conditions in cancelation and a performance hit cpython 3.12 will change the underlying implementation of `asyncio.wait_for` to use `asyncio.wait` but that is still a long way off for many people: python/cpython#98518 * adjust ci
@cdce8pcdce8p mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2023
32 tasks
aconchillo added a commit to pipecat-ai/pipecat that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2025
This is an implementation of Python's `asyncio.timeout()` which was introduced in 3.11. We strongly encourage the use of the following approach instead of `asyncio.wait_for()`. async with timeout(delay): # Your async code In Python 3.12, `asyncio.wait_for()` is implemented in terms of `asyncio.timeout()` which fixed a bunch of issues. However, this was never backported (because of the lack of `async.timeout()`) and there are still many remainig issues, specially in Python 3.10, in `async.wait_for()`. See python/cpython#98518
aconchillo added a commit to pipecat-ai/pipecat that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2025
This is an implementation of Python's `asyncio.timeout()` which was introduced in 3.11. We strongly encourage the use of the following approach instead of `asyncio.wait_for()`. async with timeout(delay): # Your async code In Python 3.12, `asyncio.wait_for()` is implemented in terms of `asyncio.timeout()` which fixed a bunch of issues. However, this was never backported (because of the lack of `async.timeout()`) and there are still many remainig issues, specially in Python 3.10, in `async.wait_for()`. See python/cpython#98518
aconchillo added a commit to pipecat-ai/pipecat that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2025
This patch implements `asyncio.timeout()` which was introduced in 3.11, as well +as `asyncio.wait_for()` on top of it. In Python 3.12, `asyncio.wait_for()` is implemented in terms of `asyncio.timeout()` which fixed a bunch of issues. However, this was never backported (because of the lack of `async.timeout()`) and there are still many remainig issues, specially in Python 3.10, in `async.wait_for()`. See python/cpython#98518
aconchillo added a commit to pipecat-ai/pipecat that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2025
This patch implements `asyncio.timeout()` which was introduced in 3.11, as well +as `asyncio.wait_for()` on top of it. In Python 3.12, `asyncio.wait_for()` is implemented in terms of `asyncio.timeout()` which fixed a bunch of issues. However, this was never backported (because of the lack of `async.timeout()`) and there are still many remainig issues, specially in Python 3.10, in `async.wait_for()`. See python/cpython#98518
aconchillo added a commit to pipecat-ai/pipecat that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2025
This patch implements a custom `asyncio.wait_for()` on top of an also custom `asyncio.timeout()`. `asyncio.timeout()` which was introduced in 3.11. In Python 3.12, `asyncio.wait_for()` is implemented in terms of `asyncio.timeout()` which fixed a bunch of issues. However, this was never backported (because of the lack of `async.timeout()`) and there are still many remainig issues, specially in Python 3.10, in `async.wait_for()`. See python/cpython#98518
aconchillo added a commit to pipecat-ai/pipecat that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2025
This patch implements a custom `asyncio.wait_for()` on top of an also custom `asyncio.timeout()`. `asyncio.timeout()` which was introduced in 3.11. In Python 3.12, `asyncio.wait_for()` is implemented in terms of `asyncio.timeout()` which fixed a bunch of issues. However, this was never backported (because of the lack of `async.timeout()`) and there are still many remainig issues, specially in Python 3.10, in `async.wait_for()`. See python/cpython#98518
aconchillo added a commit to pipecat-ai/pipecat that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2025
This patch uses `wait_for2` package to implement `asyncio.wait_for()` for Python < 3.12. In Python 3.12, `asyncio.wait_for()` is implemented in terms of `asyncio.timeout()` which fixed a bunch of issues. However, this was never backported (because of the lack of `async.timeout()`) and there are still many remainig issues, specially in Python 3.10, in `async.wait_for()`. See python/cpython#98518
aconchillo added a commit to pipecat-ai/pipecat that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2025
This patch uses `wait_for2` package to implement `asyncio.wait_for()` for Python < 3.12. In Python 3.12, `asyncio.wait_for()` is implemented in terms of `asyncio.timeout()` which fixed a bunch of issues. However, this was never backported (because of the lack of `async.timeout()`) and there are still many remainig issues, specially in Python 3.10, in `async.wait_for()`. See python/cpython#98518
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

topic-asynciotype-featureA feature request or enhancement

Projects

None yet

5 participants

@kumaraditya303@gvanrossum@akulakov@twisteroidambassador@bedevere-bot