Skip to content
/pepsPublic

PEP 655: Mark as accepted#2451

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
JelleZijlstra merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2022
Merged

PEP 655: Mark as accepted #2451

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion pep-0655.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -3,12 +3,13 @@ Title: Marking individual TypedDict items as required or potentially-missing
Author: David Foster <david at dafoster.net>
Sponsor: Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>
Discussions-To: https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/53XVOD5ZUKJ263MWA6AUPEA6J7LBBLNV/
Status: Draft
Status: Accepted
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 30-Jan-2021
Python-Version: 3.11
Post-History: 31-Jan-2021, 11-Feb-2021, 20-Feb-2021, 26-Feb-2021, 17-Jan-2022, 28-Jan-2022
Resolution: https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/AJEDNVC3FXM5QXNNW5CR4UCT4KI5XVUE/
Copy link
Member

@gpsheadgpsheadMar 22, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fyi the typing-sig version is https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/AJEDNVC3FXM5QXNNW5CR4UCT4KI5XVUE/ - the emails on this one were caught in moderation so they didn't appear at the same time ;) as discussion was on typing-sig, maybe link to that one?

Copy link
Member

@CAM-GerlachCAM-GerlachMar 22, 2022•
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, but the the Typing-SIG thread is already linked in the Discussions-To header, and Python-Dev is the canonical place to post (non-Packaging, given its SC-delegated authority) PEP resolutions per PEP 1, as most recently discussed in #2266 , implemented in #2346 and approved by the SC in python/steering-council#113:

Except where otherwise approved by the Steering Council, pronouncements of PEP resolution will be posted to the Python-Dev mailing list.



Abstract
Expand Down