Skip to content

Conversation

@JulienPalard
Copy link
Member

Closes#111.

Copy link
Member

@pradyunsgpradyunsg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing references to files that no longer exist is a worthwhile improvement!

I do think it's useful to have the .dev suffix on in-development copies though.

@JulienPalard
Copy link
MemberAuthor

I do think it's useful to have the .dev suffix on in-development copies though.

I'd be happy if you could teach me how it's useful (or sharing me a few links explaining your view, so I can learn myself) could you?

Anyway, if we keep the ".dev" I think we'll have to change the way we're doing it, as according to PEP 440 the .dev is ordered before its "non-dot-dev" courterpart. Maybe we should use .post.dev so it gets ordered after?

@JulienPalardJulienPalard merged commit 09d972d into mainApr 17, 2023
@JulienPalardJulienPalard deleted the mdk-simplify-release branch April 17, 2023 09:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Is suffixing version in the dev tree with dev usefull to someone?

5 participants

@JulienPalard@pradyunsg@m-aciek@ezio-melotti