Improve memory consumption for cancelled connection attempts#159
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While debugging some very odd memory issues in a live application, I noticed that this component shows some unexpected memory consumption and memory would not immediately be freed as expected when a connection attempt is cancelled. Let's not call this a "memory leak", because memory was eventually freed, but this clearly caused some unexpected and significant memory growth.
One of the core issues has been located and addressed via reactphp/event-loop#164, but even with that patch applied, cancelling a pending connection attempt behaved a bit unexpected.
I've used the following script to demonstrate unreasonable memory growth:
Initially this peaked at around 320 MB on my system. After applying the referenced patch, this went down significantly and fluctuated somewhere between 2 MB and 12 MB. After applying this patch, this script reports a constant memory consumption of around 1.2 MB.
This implementation includes some of the ideas discussed in reactphp/promise-timer#32, reactphp/promise#46 and #113. Eventually, we should look into providing a way to address this within our promise implementation.
My vote would to be get this in here now as it addresses a relevant memory issue and eventually address this in the upstream component (at which point this changeset also does no harm).