fix: use dynamic label names for inference to match training dataset#2403
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, the inference section used a hardcoded list of labels:
['no', 'yes', 'down', 'go', 'left', 'up', 'right', 'stop'],
which may not match the order of class names in
train_ds.class_names.This could lead to incorrect labeling in prediction visualizations.
This commit replaces the hardcoded labels with
label_namesfrom the training dataset to ensure the model's outputs are correctly mapped to their respective labels.