Skip to content

Conversation

@maclover7
Copy link
Contributor

@maclover7maclover7 commented Aug 14, 2018

TCPWrap::Bind and TCPWrap::Bind6 share a large amount of functionality, so a common DoBind was extracted to remove duplication. TCPWrap::Connect/TCPWrap::Connect6 follow this same pattern, so DoConnect was extracted from those two methods to also remove duplication.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. net Issues and PRs related to the net subsystem. labels Aug 14, 2018
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

The change looks fine but can you include a quick description of the rationale in the commit log and PR description?

@maclover7
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@BridgeARBridgeAR requested a review from addaleaxAugust 17, 2018 15:41
@addaleax
Copy link
Member

@addaleaxaddaleax added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Aug 19, 2018
@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

This PR needs a rebase against master to avoid the git failure in the CI.

@addaleaxaddaleax removed the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Aug 25, 2018
@addaleax
Copy link
Member

@maclover7 Can you rebase?

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

Ping @maclover7

@maclover7
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@addaleax@jasnell Rebased — sorry for my delay

`TCPWrap::Bind` and `TCPWrap::Bind6` share a large amount of functionality, so a common `Bind` was extracted to remove duplication.
Copy link
Member

@addaleaxaddaleax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still LGTM

@maclover7
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@maclover7
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@maclover7
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Could use another review or two @nodejs/collaborators

Copy link
Member

@indutnyindutny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM if CI is happy. Thanks!

src/tcp_wrap.cc Outdated
sockaddr_in addr;
int err = uv_ip4_addr(*ip_address, port, &addr);
if (family == AF_INET6 &&
!args[2]->Uint32Value(env->context()).To(&flags)) return;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this pass lint? I'd rather put return on a next line and add braces on this line and the line after return.

@ronkorving
Copy link
Contributor

ronkorving commented Dec 5, 2018

I have to share a somewhat amusing observation that while the intention of this PR is to reduce code (redundancy), GitHub measures it to remove as many lines as it adds (+23 −23).

While I can appreciate the sentiment, I see this as increasing complexity in order to remove code duplication, shrinking the code base by 0 lines.

-0 on this one.

@maclover7
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

maclover7 commented Dec 17, 2018

Fixed @indutny's comment

New CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/19590/ ✔️

@TrottTrott added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Dec 17, 2018
@maclover7
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Landed in 4b96a2a

@maclover7maclover7 deleted the jm-extract-tcp branch December 17, 2018 21:41
maclover7 added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2018
`TCPWrap::Bind` and `TCPWrap::Bind6` share a large amount of functionality, so a common `Bind` was extracted to remove duplication. PR-URL: #22315 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 25, 2018
`TCPWrap::Bind` and `TCPWrap::Bind6` share a large amount of functionality, so a common `Bind` was extracted to remove duplication. PR-URL: #22315 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
@MylesBorinsMylesBorins mentioned this pull request Dec 25, 2018
refack pushed a commit to refack/node that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2019
`TCPWrap::Bind` and `TCPWrap::Bind6` share a large amount of functionality, so a common `Bind` was extracted to remove duplication. PR-URL: nodejs#22315 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit to BethGriggs/node that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2019
`TCPWrap::Bind` and `TCPWrap::Bind6` share a large amount of functionality, so a common `Bind` was extracted to remove duplication. Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#28222 PR-URL: nodejs#22315 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2019
`TCPWrap::Bind` and `TCPWrap::Bind6` share a large amount of functionality, so a common `Bind` was extracted to remove duplication. Backport-PR-URL: #28222 PR-URL: #22315 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2019
`TCPWrap::Bind` and `TCPWrap::Bind6` share a large amount of functionality, so a common `Bind` was extracted to remove duplication. Backport-PR-URL: #28222 PR-URL: #22315 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
@BethGriggsBethGriggs mentioned this pull request Jul 17, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.netIssues and PRs related to the net subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants

@maclover7@nodejs-github-bot@jasnell@addaleax@joyeecheung@ronkorving@indutny@lundibundi@Trott@BethGriggs