doc: add missing changes entry#24758
Closed
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The `util.format()` behavior changed recently. Add the changes entry to document the new BigInt behavior.
nodejs-github-bot added doc 
addaleax approved these changes Nov 30, 2018
antsmartian approved these changes Dec 1, 2018
BridgeAR added the author ready 
lpinca approved these changes Dec 1, 2018
BridgeAR added a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2018
The `util.format()` behavior changed recently. Add the changes entry to document the new BigInt behavior. PR-URL: nodejs#24758 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
MemberAuthor
BridgeAR commented Dec 3, 2018
Landed in e00639e |
BridgeAR added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2018
The `util.format()` behavior changed recently. Add the changes entry to document the new BigInt behavior. PR-URL: #24758 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
This was referenced Dec 7, 2018
refack pushed a commit to refack/node that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2019
The `util.format()` behavior changed recently. Add the changes entry to document the new BigInt behavior. PR-URL: nodejs#24758 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2019
The `util.format()` behavior changed recently. Add the changes entry to document the new BigInt behavior. PR-URL: #24758 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2019
The `util.format()` behavior changed recently. Add the changes entry to document the new BigInt behavior. PR-URL: #24758 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Merged
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
util.format()behavior changed recently. Add the changes entryto document the new BigInt behavior.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes