Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.3k
doc: remove statement about (EC)DHE performance#41528
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
tniessen wants to merge 1 commit into nodejs:master from tniessen:doc-ephemeral-is-not-a-performance-issue
Closed
doc: remove statement about (EC)DHE performance #41528
tniessen wants to merge 1 commit into nodejs:master from tniessen:doc-ephemeral-is-not-a-performance-issue
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
tniessen commented Jan 14, 2022
- This statement is misleading in that it says "key generation is expensive". ECDHE key generation (over the elliptic curves that are commonly used for TLS) is insanely fast compared to most other types of key generation.
- This statement is irrelevant for TLS 1.3, which requires (EC)DHE.
- Even if this statement is somewhat true for TLS 1.2, it does not justify discouraging the use of (EC)DHE.
MemberAuthor
tniessen commented Jan 14, 2022
cc @nodejs/crypto |
Trott approved these changes Jan 15, 2022
addaleax approved these changes Jan 15, 2022
benjamingr approved these changes Jan 15, 2022
Member
benjamingr left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All these changes are really good 🙇
tniessen added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2022
This statement is misleading in that it says "key generation is expensive". ECDHE key generation (over the elliptic curves that are commonly used for TLS) is insanely fast compared to most other types of key generation. This statement is irrelevant for TLS 1.3, which requires (EC)DHE. Even if this statement is somewhat true for TLS 1.2, it does not justify discouraging the use of (EC)DHE. PR-URL: #41528 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
MemberAuthor
tniessen commented Jan 16, 2022
Landed in 986cf3b. Thanks @benjamingr and thanks all for reviewing! |
mawaregetsuka pushed a commit to mawaregetsuka/node that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2022
This statement is misleading in that it says "key generation is expensive". ECDHE key generation (over the elliptic curves that are commonly used for TLS) is insanely fast compared to most other types of key generation. This statement is irrelevant for TLS 1.3, which requires (EC)DHE. Even if this statement is somewhat true for TLS 1.2, it does not justify discouraging the use of (EC)DHE. PR-URL: nodejs#41528 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
thedull pushed a commit to thedull/node that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2022
This statement is misleading in that it says "key generation is expensive". ECDHE key generation (over the elliptic curves that are commonly used for TLS) is insanely fast compared to most other types of key generation. This statement is irrelevant for TLS 1.3, which requires (EC)DHE. Even if this statement is somewhat true for TLS 1.2, it does not justify discouraging the use of (EC)DHE. PR-URL: nodejs#41528 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2022
This statement is misleading in that it says "key generation is expensive". ECDHE key generation (over the elliptic curves that are commonly used for TLS) is insanely fast compared to most other types of key generation. This statement is irrelevant for TLS 1.3, which requires (EC)DHE. Even if this statement is somewhat true for TLS 1.2, it does not justify discouraging the use of (EC)DHE. PR-URL: #41528 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Linkgoron pushed a commit to Linkgoron/node that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2022
This statement is misleading in that it says "key generation is expensive". ECDHE key generation (over the elliptic curves that are commonly used for TLS) is insanely fast compared to most other types of key generation. This statement is irrelevant for TLS 1.3, which requires (EC)DHE. Even if this statement is somewhat true for TLS 1.2, it does not justify discouraging the use of (EC)DHE. PR-URL: nodejs#41528 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2022
This statement is misleading in that it says "key generation is expensive". ECDHE key generation (over the elliptic curves that are commonly used for TLS) is insanely fast compared to most other types of key generation. This statement is irrelevant for TLS 1.3, which requires (EC)DHE. Even if this statement is somewhat true for TLS 1.2, it does not justify discouraging the use of (EC)DHE. PR-URL: #41528 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.