Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.3k
doc: add note about resource type in async_hooks#41797
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
Trott commented Feb 1, 2022 • edited by Mesteery
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited by Mesteery
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Welcome @tony-go and thanks for the pull request. Are you able to edit the first commit message? The first word after |
cdbda7b to e1aff5cComparetony-go commented Feb 1, 2022
Thanks for the feedback @Trott 🙌. Let me know if it's good now. |
RafaelGSS left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
RafaelGSS commented Feb 1, 2022
cc: @Qard |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
RaisinTen left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks!
Trott commented Feb 2, 2022
@nodejs/async_hooks |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
nodejs-github-bot commented Feb 3, 2022
Landed in 064783c |
PR-URL: nodejs#41797 Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #41797 Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #41797 Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #41797 Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #41797 Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <[email protected]>
Hi everyone 👋
During the last Diagnostic WG meeting, the question has been raised of the
typeargument interface (async_hooks/inithook).The initial demand was to document more precisely each type. But @bmeckmentions that this list of identifiers described in the documentation could arbitrarily change.
So, this pull request contains a note to explicitly tell users what is the status of these identifiers.
CC @RafaelGSS / @gireeshpunathil