Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.2k
node-api: add status napi_cannot_run_js#47986
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
node-api: add status napi_cannot_run_js #47986
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
nodejs-github-bot commented May 13, 2023 • edited by gabrielschulhof
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited by gabrielschulhof
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Review requested:
|
b2fd523 to a843857CompareAdd the new status in order to distinguish a state wherein an exception is pending from one wherein the engine is unable to execute JS. We take advantage of the new runtime add-on version reporting in order to remain forward compatible with add-ons that do not expect the new status code.
a843857 to 0e89301CompareUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
gabrielschulhof commented May 18, 2023
@legendecas I have addressed your review comments. Please take another look! |
legendecas left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM % nits.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
nodejs-github-bot commented May 19, 2023
Some platforms do not seem to support target_defaults.
nodejs-github-bot commented May 19, 2023
nodejs-github-bot commented May 19, 2023
nodejs-github-bot commented May 20, 2023
Add the new status in order to distinguish a state wherein an exception is pending from one wherein the engine is unable to execute JS. We take advantage of the new runtime add-on version reporting in order to remain forward compatible with add-ons that do not expect the new status code. PR-URL: #47986 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]>
Add the new status in order to distinguish a state wherein an exception is pending from one wherein the engine is unable to execute JS. We take advantage of the new runtime add-on version reporting in order to remain forward compatible with add-ons that do not expect the new status code. PR-URL: nodejs#47986 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]>
Add the new status in order to distinguish a state wherein an exception is pending from one wherein the engine is unable to execute JS. We take advantage of the new runtime add-on version reporting in order to remain forward compatible with add-ons that do not expect the new status code. PR-URL: nodejs#47986 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]>
This test has been failing occasionally since it was introduced ~5 days ago. It was the nodejs#1 failing JS test in the most recent reliability report. Mark it as flaky. Fixes: nodejs#48180 Refs: nodejs#47986 Refs: nodejs/reliability#576
This test has been failing occasionally since it was introduced ~5 days ago. It was the most common failing JS test in the most recent reliability report. Mark it as flaky. Fixes: nodejs#48180 Refs: nodejs#47986 Refs: nodejs/reliability#576
This test has been failing occasionally since it was introduced ~5 days ago. It was the most common failing JS test in the most recent reliability report. Mark it as flaky. Fixes: #48180 Refs: #47986 Refs: nodejs/reliability#576 PR-URL: #48181 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Add the new status in order to distinguish a state wherein an exception is pending from one wherein the engine is unable to execute JS. We take advantage of the new runtime add-on version reporting in order to remain forward compatible with add-ons that do not expect the new status code. PR-URL: #47986 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]>
This test has been failing occasionally since it was introduced ~5 days ago. It was the most common failing JS test in the most recent reliability report. Mark it as flaky. Fixes: #48180 Refs: #47986 Refs: nodejs/reliability#576 PR-URL: #48181 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Add the new status in order to distinguish a state wherein an exception is pending from one wherein the engine is unable to execute JS. We take advantage of the new runtime add-on version reporting in order to remain forward compatible with add-ons that do not expect the new status code. PR-URL: #47986 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]>
This test has been failing occasionally since it was introduced ~5 days ago. It was the most common failing JS test in the most recent reliability report. Mark it as flaky. Fixes: #48180 Refs: #47986 Refs: nodejs/reliability#576 PR-URL: #48181 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Add the new status in order to distinguish a state wherein an exception is pending from one wherein the engine is unable to execute JS. We take advantage of the new runtime add-on version reporting in order to remain forward compatible with add-ons that do not expect the new status code. PR-URL: nodejs#47986 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]>
This test has been failing occasionally since it was introduced ~5 days ago. It was the most common failing JS test in the most recent reliability report. Mark it as flaky. Fixes: nodejs#48180 Refs: nodejs#47986 Refs: nodejs/reliability#576 PR-URL: nodejs#48181 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
This test has been failing occasionally since it was introduced ~5 days ago. It was the most common failing JS test in the most recent reliability report. Mark it as flaky. Fixes: nodejs#48180 Refs: nodejs#47986 Refs: nodejs/reliability#576 PR-URL: nodejs#48181 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
This test has been failing occasionally since it was introduced ~5 days ago. It was the most common failing JS test in the most recent reliability report. Mark it as flaky. Fixes: nodejs#48180 Refs: nodejs#47986 Refs: nodejs/reliability#576 PR-URL: nodejs#48181 Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Add the new status in order to distinguish a state wherein an exception is pending from one wherein the engine is unable to execute JS. We take advantage of the new runtime add-on version reporting in order to remain forward compatible with add-ons that do not expect the new status code.