gh-99276 - Updated Doc/faq/general.rst

[workingpayload]

• Issue: Add link to the first article about Python #99276

[ghost]

All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement.

[hugovk]

Thanks for the PR, but:

• this is an article not a book, so doesn't belong in the books section
• this article is already mentioned in the previous section about articles: https://docs.python.org/3/faq/general.html#are-there-any-published-articles-about-python-that-i-can-reference

Issue gh-99276 was about adding the https://ir.cwi.nl/pub/18204 article link to that articles section:

• https://docs.python.org/3/faq/general.html#are-there-any-published-articles-about-python-that-i-can-reference

Please could you update the PR?

[bedevere-bot]

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

[workingpayload]

Thanks for the PR, but:

• this is an article not a book, so doesn't belong in the books section
• this article is already mentioned in the previous section about articles: https://docs.python.org/3/faq/general.html#are-there-any-published-articles-about-python-that-i-can-reference

Issue gh-99276 was about adding the https://ir.cwi.nl/pub/18204 article link to that articles section:

• https://docs.python.org/3/faq/general.html#are-there-any-published-articles-about-python-that-i-can-reference

Please could you update the PR?

Yeah Sure!!

[workingpayload]

I have made the requested changes; please review again

[bedevere-bot]

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@hugovk: please review the changes made to this pull request.

[hugovk]

Rather than adding that extra line, shall we add an inline link?

For example, to add the link around "very first article":

-The very first article about Python was written in 1991 and is now quite-outdated.+The `very first article <https://ir.cwi.nl/pub/18204>` about Python was +written in 1991 and is now quite outdated.

[workingpayload]

Rather than adding that extra line, shall we add an inline link?

For example, to add the link around "very first article":

-The very first article about Python was written in 1991 and is now quite-outdated.+The `very first article <https://ir.cwi.nl/pub/18204>` about Python was +written in 1991 and is now quite outdated.

Yeah sure!!
I'll do that.
Thank you for helping me out.

[workingpayload]

I have made the requested changes; please review again

[bedevere-bot]

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@hugovk: please review the changes made to this pull request.

[workingpayload]

I have made the requested changes; please review again

[bedevere-bot]

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@hugovk: please review the changes made to this pull request.

[hugovk]

Thanks!

[miss-islington]

Thanks @workingpayload for the PR, and @hugovk for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10, 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

[bedevere-bot]

GH-101461 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.

[bedevere-bot]

GH-101462 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch.