Skip to content

Conversation

@webknjaz
Copy link
Member

@webknjazwebknjaz commented Jul 22, 2023

Co-authored-by: Adam Turner 9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade hugovk@users.noreply.github.com.
(cherry picked from commit 88d14da)

Use CSV-separated outputs @ get-changed-files @ CI (#105151)

Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade hugovk@users.noreply.github.com
(cherry picked from commit eaa6702)


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--107042.org.readthedocs.build/

Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit 88d14da) Co-authored-by: Sviatoslav Sydorenko <wk.cvs.github@sydorenko.org.ua>
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit eaa6702)
@AlexWaygoodAlexWaygood changed the base branch from main to 3.12July 22, 2023 14:47
@webknjazwebknjaz changed the title [3.12] Convert doc.yml workflow to be reusable (GH-103914)[3.12] Convert doc.yml workflow to be reusable (GH-103914 + GH-105151)Jul 22, 2023
@webknjazwebknjaz marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2023 15:05
@webknjaz
Copy link
MemberAuthor

@AlexWaygood thanks for fixing the target branch, I overlooked that..

@ambv@pablogsal could you merge the first batch of the backports plz?

@AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member

@ambv@pablogsal could you merge the first batch of the backports plz?

None of our CI has yet run on this PR. Since this change is purely focussed on improving our CI, it's important for the CI to run before we can think about merging this :)

@AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member

@ambv@pablogsal could you merge the first batch of the backports plz?

None of our CI has yet run on this PR. Since this change is purely focussed on improving our CI, it's important for the CI to run before we can think about merging this :)

It passed after closing and reopening the PR.

@webknjaz
Copy link
MemberAuthor

None of our CI has yet run on this PR. Since this change is purely focussed on improving our CI, it's important for the CI to run before we can think about merging this :)

Ah, yeah. It's basically a prerequisite for another backport that will add alls-green to the supported branches too and will help @ambv enable the auto-merge feature.

@ambvambv merged commit 1703262 into python:3.12Jul 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@webknjaz@AlexWaygood@ambv@bedevere-bot