gh-89083: support UUID version 7 (monotonous version) (RFC 9562) [abandoned proposal]#120830
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
picnixz commented Jun 22, 2024
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
picnixz changed the title MemberAuthor
picnixz commented Jun 28, 2024
In light of the discussion on the issue and discourse (well it's a monologue on Discourse for now), I will go for Method 1 instead of Method 2. I'll open another PR soon (with only version 7). |
MemberAuthor
picnixz commented Jun 28, 2024
Closing in favor of #121119. |
picnixz changed the title Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an alternative to #120650 where UUIDv7 features monotonous properties.
There's still the question on the semantics of the time-fields since they are no more compatible with UUIDv1 (actually, the docs are rather imprecise since they do not say that
time_lowfor a non-UUIDv1 is not meaningful). For design discussions on this, I'd prefer doing it on #120650.📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--120830.org.readthedocs.build/