Skip to content

Conversation

@Fidget-Spinner
Copy link
Member

@Fidget-SpinnerFidget-Spinner commented Dec 12, 2025

@Zheaoli
Copy link
Contributor

Should I change #136070 to avoid the refleak?

Copy link
Member

@vstinnervstinner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM: I confirm that this change fix the refleak. I didn't review the change itself, it just looks good to me :-)

$ ./python -m test test.test_multiprocessing_fork.test_threads -R 3:3 (...) Result: SUCCESS 

@Fidget-Spinner
Copy link
MemberAuthor

Should I change #136070 to avoid the refleak?

The PR can't be fixed/ the code generator won't allow the change until #142604 is merged.

@Fidget-SpinnerFidget-Spinner merged commit a3a611b into python:mainDec 12, 2025
72 checks passed
@Fidget-SpinnerFidget-Spinner deleted the partial_revert_135860 branch December 12, 2025 14:05
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Fidget-Spinner@Zheaoli@vstinner