Skip to content

bpo-42972: Track sqlite3 statement objects#26475

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
vstinner merged 5 commits into from
Jun 1, 2021
Merged

bpo-42972: Track sqlite3 statement objects #26475

vstinner merged 5 commits into from
Jun 1, 2021

Conversation

@erlend-aasland
Copy link
Contributor

@erlend-aaslanderlend-aasland commented May 31, 2021•
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

@erlend-aasland
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

erlend-aasland commented May 31, 2021

cc. @vstinner

@erlend-aaslanderlend-aasland mentioned this pull request May 31, 2021
Closed
pablogsal
pablogsal requested changes May 31, 2021
View reviewed changes
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

bedevere-bot commented May 31, 2021

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

Erlend E. Aasland added 2 commits June 1, 2021 09:26
Allocate and track statement objects in pysqlite_statement_create
1b0f583
By allocating and tracking creation of statement object in pysqlite_statement_create(), the caller does not need to worry about GC syncronization, and eliminates the possibility of getting a badly created object. All related fault handling is moved to pysqlite_statement_create().
Remove now unused constants
0a6ca75
vstinner
vstinner approved these changes Jun 1, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@vstinnervstinner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but I would like to see the minor issues being addressed first before merging your change.

Erlend Egeberg Aaslandand others added 2 commits June 1, 2021 12:13
vstinner
vstinner approved these changes Jun 1, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@vstinnervstinner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@vstinnervstinner merged commit fffa0f9 into python:mainJun 1, 2021
@vstinner
Copy link
Member

vstinner commented Jun 1, 2021

Merged, thanks.

@erlend-aaslanderlend-aasland deleted the sqlite-track-stmt branch June 1, 2021 10:51
@erlend-aasland
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

erlend-aasland commented Jun 1, 2021

Merged, thanks.

Thanks for reviewing, Victor & Pablo!

erlend-aasland pushed a commit to erlend-aasland/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2021
pysqlite_statement_create now returns a Py object, not an int
448ad9d
pythonGH-26206 was broken by pythonGH-26475.
@erlend-aaslanderlend-aasland mentioned this pull request Jun 2, 2021
Merged
pablogsal pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2021
bpo-44165: pysqlite_statement_create now returns a Py object, not an …
fbf25b8
…int (GH-26484) GH-26206 was broken by GH-26475.
@MariattaMariatta added needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes and removed needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes labels Jun 2, 2021
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

miss-islington commented Jun 2, 2021

Thanks @erlend-aasland for the PR, and @vstinner for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

miss-islington commented Jun 2, 2021

Sorry, @erlend-aasland and @vstinner, I could not cleanly backport this to 3.10 due to a conflict.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker fffa0f92adaaed0bcb3907d982506f78925e9052 3.10

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

vstinner commented Jun 2, 2021

@erlend-aasland: Automated backport to 3.10 failed, can you try to backport the change manually?

@pablogsal: I'm not sure if this change is really a bugfix or an enhancement. I'm ok to backport it even after beta2 release.

@erlend-aasland
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

erlend-aasland commented Jun 3, 2021

@erlend-aasland: Automated backport to 3.10 failed, can you try to backport the change manually?

Will do!

erlend-aasland pushed a commit to erlend-aasland/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2021
[3.10] bpo-42972: Track sqlite3 statement objects (pythonGH-26475)
93f9a45
Allocate and track statement objects in pysqlite_statement_create. By allocating and tracking creation of statement object in pysqlite_statement_create(), the caller does not need to worry about GC syncronization, and eliminates the possibility of getting a badly created object. All related fault handling is moved to pysqlite_statement_create(). Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>. (cherry picked from commit fffa0f9) Co-authored-by: Erlend Egeberg Aasland <[email protected]>
@bedevere-botbedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes label Jun 3, 2021
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

bedevere-bot commented Jun 3, 2021

GH-26515 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch.

vstinner pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2021
[3.10]bpo-42972: Track sqlite3 statement objects (GH-26475) (GH-26515)
84d80f5
Allocate and track statement objects in pysqlite_statement_create. By allocating and tracking creation of statement object in pysqlite_statement_create(), the caller does not need to worry about GC syncronization, and eliminates the possibility of getting a badly created object. All related fault handling is moved to pysqlite_statement_create(). Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>. (cherry picked from commit fffa0f9) Co-authored-by: Erlend Egeberg Aasland <[email protected]>
@pablogsalpablogsal mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2021
Closed
@vstinnervstinner mentioned this pull request Jun 9, 2022
Closed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@pablogsalpablogsalpablogsal requested changes

@vstinnervstinnervstinner approved these changes

@berkerpeksagberkerpeksagAwaiting requested review from berkerpeksagberkerpeksag is a code owner

Assignees

@vstinnervstinner

Labels

skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants

@erlend-aasland@bedevere-bot@vstinner@miss-islington@pablogsal@Mariatta@the-knights-who-say-ni