Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.9k
bpo-41930: Add support for SQLite serialise/deserialise API#26728
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
erlend-aasland commented Jun 14, 2021 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
2739573 to 07d3b5cCompareDon't return size; use len() on the returned bytes object instead.
Add basic test for this
Regen clinic after pythonGH-27155.
Sync with main bco. pythonGH-27273
Sync with main bco. pythonGH-27431
JelleZijlstra left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. I'm on board with merging this, since it's generally useful for sqlite3 to expose more of the underlying SQLite API, the feature is simple and shouldn't need much maintenance in the future, and there haven't been any objections on the issue.
I do have a few small comments. Once those are addressed, I'll ask Guido for a second look and then merge the PR.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
bedevere-bot commented Feb 28, 2022
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
- adjust docs - deserialize returns None - remove 'non-standard' from docstring
JelleZijlstra left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! @gvanrossum I'm planning to merge this PR (adding two new functions to sqlite3)
gvanrossum commented Feb 28, 2022
SGTM |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com>
erlend-aasland commented Mar 8, 2022
FYI: synced with |
erlend-aasland commented Apr 5, 2022
@JelleZijlstra, will you be able to merge this before todays alpha? |
JelleZijlstra commented Apr 5, 2022
Oops, sorry for dropping this. There are merge conflicts on the configure scripts, could you resolve those? |
erlend-aasland commented Apr 5, 2022
Thanks, Jelle! |
- Blob from python/cpython#30680 (and anticipating that python/cpython#91550 will be merged) - Aggregate window functions from python/cpython#20903 - Serialize/deserialize from python/cpython#26728 - Limit setting from python/cpython#28463
- Blob from python/cpython#30680 (and anticipating that python/cpython#91550 will be merged) - Aggregate window functions from python/cpython#20903 - Serialize/deserialize from python/cpython#26728 - Limit setting from python/cpython#28463
https://bugs.python.org/issue41930