Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34k
bpo-23952: Document cgi module's maxlen variable#30338
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Conversation
hugovk commented Jan 2, 2022 • edited by bedevere-bot
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
edited by bedevere-bot
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
rhettinger left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good start. Please also update the main docs at Docs/library/cgi.rst.
bedevere-bot commented Jan 2, 2022
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
hugovk commented Jan 2, 2022
Updated! I have made the requested changes; please review again. |
bedevere-bot commented Jan 2, 2022
Thanks for making the requested changes! @rhettinger: please review the changes made to this pull request. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
bedevere-bot commented Jan 2, 2022
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
hugovk commented Jan 2, 2022
I have made the requested changes; please review again |
bedevere-bot commented Jan 2, 2022
Thanks for making the requested changes! @rhettinger, @ethanfurman: please review the changes made to this pull request. |
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
bedevere-bot commented Feb 5, 2022
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @ethanfurman for commit 90442ca 🤖 If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the ":hammer: test-with-buildbots" label again. |
hugovk commented Feb 5, 2022
Detailshttps://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/217/builds/431/steps/5/logs/stdio Likely unrelated to this docs change, so rescheduling. |
bedevere-bot commented Feb 5, 2022
hugovk commented Feb 5, 2022
Same thing. The |
Using the text suggested in https://bugs.python.org/issue23952.
I think this documentation-only change can skip a NEWS file.
https://bugs.python.org/issue23952