Add Topic for release schedule PEPs

[JelleZijlstra]

Release PEPs are a pretty unusual kind of PEP and it's useful to me to have
them all listed together. Happy to adjust the name of the topic if desired.

I took the opportunity to adjust the status of a few release PEPs. Now all
releases for EOL versions are Final (3.5 was previously Active), and all
releases for released versions are Active (3.10 was still draft). 3.11 remains
Draft as 3.11 has not yet been released.

[hugovk]

This would be useful.

Preview: https://pep-previews--2669.org.readthedocs.build/topic/releases/

Please also include PEP 693 for Python 3.12.

[AA-Turner]

Happy to adjust the name of the topic if desired.

"Release Schedule" would make sense to me, spaces are allowed within the topic names.

A

[AA-Turner]

Please also add PEP-160, PEP-200, PEP-226, PEP-251, PEP-283, PEP-320, and PEP-356

A

[CAM-Gerlach]

"Release Schedule" would make sense to me, spaces are allowed within the topic names.

But then the URL to the topic page wouldn't match the lowercase/case insensitive topic name; either it would have to have _, - inserted or escape codes inserted, and the same for the generated rst file name. It's also extra words, and the "Releases" PEP isn't just a schedule, it also lists the features of the release, crew, and other details.

[pradyunsg]

My 2 cents: "Release Schedule" or "Release" are better names since they'll read better in the page heading ("Release Schedule PEPs"/"Release PEPs"). Right now, it looks to me like there's a grammatical error in there.

[pradyunsg]

It might also make sense to retitle "Other Informational PEPs" to "Informational PEPs" on all pages, since having an "Other" in the first heading seems wrong (as is the case with this topic index right now).

[CAM-Gerlach]

My 2 cents: "Release Schedule" or "Release" are better names since they'll read better in the page heading ("Release Schedule PEPs"/"Release PEPs"). Right now, it looks to me like there's a grammatical error in there.

👍 to "Release"

[JelleZijlstra]

The latest pushes add the PEPs I missed (thanks Adam for digging those up!), address other feedback, and rename the header to "Release".

[CAM-Gerlach]

Sorry I didn't mention it before, but like on #2670 , I suggest using a consistant header order with the existing packaging-topic PEPs, i.e. Topic after Type.

[CAM-Gerlach]

LGTM, thanks @JelleZijlstra