Skip to content

Conversation

@brandtbucher
Copy link
Member

@brandtbucherbrandtbucher commented Dec 15, 2022

COMPARE_OP_FLOAT_JUMP contains two DEOPT_IF branches for NaN values. This means that COMPARE_OP will repeatedly specialize and deoptimize in the presence of NaNs.

The current scheme can be slightly modified to handle unordered operands correctly, and remove these checks entirely.

@brandtbucherbrandtbucher added performance Performance or resource usage interpreter-core (Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs) labels Dec 15, 2022
@brandtbucherbrandtbucher self-assigned this Dec 15, 2022
@bedevere-botbedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2022
@netlify
Copy link

netlifybot commented Dec 15, 2022

Deploy Preview for python-cpython-preview ready!

NameLink
🔨 Latest commit9dc68aa
🔍 Latest deploy loghttps://app.netlify.com/sites/python-cpython-preview/deploys/639b8c16d9b4720008a2e72e
😎 Deploy Previewhttps://deploy-preview-100278--python-cpython-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

DEOPT_IF(isnan(dright), COMPARE_OP);
STAT_INC(COMPARE_OP, hit);
// 1 if NaN, 2 if <, 4 if >, 8 if ==; this matches when_to_jump_mask
intsign_ish=1 << (2* (dleft >= dright) + (dleft <= dright));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clever -- roughly the same number of instructions too!

Copy link
MemberAuthor

@brandtbucherbrandtbucherDec 16, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Credit to @markshannon for figuring this out. I had tried something similar (with >= and <=), but couldn't get the masks to work correctly without his help.

Copy link
Member

@mdickinsonmdickinsonDec 16, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is potentially a bit dangerous: a comparison with NaN may raise FE_INVALID. It may be safer to use the isless macro instead.

From C99 (§7.12.14.3):

The isless macro determines whether its first argument is less than its second argument. The value of isless(x, y) is always equal to (x) < (y); however, unlike (x) < (y), isless(x, y) does not raise the ‘‘invalid’’ floating-point exception when x and y are unordered.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, that should be islessequal of course, not isless.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

float_richcompare uses simple i < j comparisons. Why is that OK, but not here?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@brandtbucher No, not specific to signalling NaNs, just to comparisons involving NaNs. And yes, float_richcompare should be updated to use the safer code, now that we're allowed to depend on C99 features.

Copy link
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay. I'll merge this, and create a separate issue where we can discuss how/if we should avoid potential floating-point exceptions everywhere (since that seems like a much bigger change).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And yes, it's platform-specific. I think we're in a place now where all current platforms do the "right" thing, but that wasn't always the case. There were a few related issues in the past - #81655 is the only one I'm finding right now, though. So yes, probably a non-issue at this point.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

create a separate issue

Thanks. Don't worry about this, though - I think I'm fussing about things that were historically an issue, but are no longer. It's not that long ago that we did protect all floating-point operations, e.g., here's float_richcompare in Python 2.7:

PyFPE_START_PROTECT("richcompare", returnNULL)
switch (op){
casePy_EQ:
r=i==j;
break;
casePy_NE:
r=i!=j;
break;
casePy_LE:
r=i <= j;
break;
casePy_GE:
r=i >= j;
break;
casePy_LT:
r=i<j;
break;
casePy_GT:
r=i>j;
break;
}
PyFPE_END_PROTECT(r)

But it seems that all current platforms do follow the IEEE 754 standard's advice on "default" floating-point exception handling settings, so this is something we no longer need to worry about.

Copy link
Member

@mdickinsonmdickinsonDec 16, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(FTR, it looks like Python 3.9 is where we discarded the PyFPE_START_PROTECT / PyFPE_END_PROTECT guards everywhere. They're still present in 3.8.)

intwhen_to_jump_mask=compare_masks[oparg];
if (next_opcode==POP_JUMP_IF_FALSE){
when_to_jump_mask= (1 | 2 | 4) & ~when_to_jump_mask;
when_to_jump_mask= (1 | 2 | 4 | 8) & ~when_to_jump_mask;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was skeptical of this at first, since I had thought about this as "use _Py_SwappedOp[op]", which would be wrong. But this looks correct -- it only swaps which branch to take.

Copy link
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep. The swapped ops used to be each others' bitwise inversions. That's no longer the case for the "unordered" bit, since NaNs only care if the operation is != or not.

@brandtbucherbrandtbucher merged commit 9076455 into python:mainDec 16, 2022
carljm added a commit to carljm/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2022
* main: pythongh-99540: Constant hash for _PyNone_Type to aid reproducibility (pythonGH-99541) pythongh-100039: enhance __signature__ to work with str and callables (pythonGH-100168) pythongh-99830: asyncio: Document returns of remove_{reader,writer} (python#100302) "Compound statement" docs: Fix with-statement step indexing (python#100286) pythonGH-90043: Handle NaNs in COMPARE_OP_FLOAT_JUMP (pythonGH-100278)
shihai1991 added a commit to shihai1991/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2022
* origin/main: (1306 commits) Correct CVE-2020-10735 documentation (python#100306) pythongh-100272: Fix JSON serialization of OrderedDict (pythonGH-100273) pythongh-93649: Split tracemalloc tests from _testcapimodule.c (python#99551) Docs: Use `PY_VERSION_HEX` for version comparison (python#100179) pythongh-97909: Fix markup for `PyMethodDef` members (python#100089) pythongh-99240: Reset pointer to NULL when the pointed memory is freed in argument parsing (python#99890) pythongh-99240: Reset pointer to NULL when the pointed memory is freed in argument parsing (python#99890) pythonGH-98831: Add DECREF_INPUTS(), expanding to DECREF() each stack input (python#100205) pythongh-78707: deprecate passing >1 argument to `PurePath.[is_]relative_to()` (pythonGH-94469) pythongh-99540: Constant hash for _PyNone_Type to aid reproducibility (pythonGH-99541) pythongh-100039: enhance __signature__ to work with str and callables (pythonGH-100168) pythongh-99830: asyncio: Document returns of remove_{reader,writer} (python#100302) "Compound statement" docs: Fix with-statement step indexing (python#100286) pythonGH-90043: Handle NaNs in COMPARE_OP_FLOAT_JUMP (pythonGH-100278) Improve stats presentation for calls. (pythonGH-100274) Better stats for `LOAD_ATTR` and `STORE_ATTR` (pythonGH-100295) pythongh-81057: Move the Cached Parser Dummy Name to _PyRuntimeState (python#100277) Document that zipfile's pwd parameter is a `bytes` object (python#100209) pythongh-99767: mark `PyTypeObject.tp_watched` as internal use only in table (python#100271) Fix typo in introduction.rst (python#100266) ...
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

interpreter-core(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)performancePerformance or resource usage

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@brandtbucher@mdickinson@markshannon@sweeneyde@bedevere-bot